Article Text

other Versions

PDF
A pan-London approach to patient group directions in sexual health services: from aspiration to reality
  1. Angela Bussey1,
  2. Kathy French2
  1. 1Principal Pharmacist Medicines Information Projects, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Independent Nurse, London Sexual Health PGD Project Lead, London UK
  1. Correspondence to Mrs Angela Bussey, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust – Medicines Information, Pharmacy Department, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK; angela.bussey{at}gstt.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Background

A patient group direction (PGD) is a legal mechanism1 that allows the supply and/or administration of a specified medicine or medicines, by named authorised health professionals, to a well-defined group of patients requiring treatment for the condition described in the PGD without the need for a prescription or an instruction from a prescriber. Using a PGD is not a form of prescribing.2

Whilst prescribing remains the preferred option for the majority of care,2 sexual health services have been dependent on this legal mechanism to supply and administer medicines in the absence of timely access to a prescriber for many years.

For example, medicines may be supplied by registered nurses or pharmacists to people attending for contraception or for other unscheduled care in a sexual health clinic or in a community pharmacy for a discrete treatment episode, such as emergency contraception or treatment for chlamydia.

Whilst nurses and pharmacists may now train to become independent non-medical prescribers in their own right, many services still rely on PGDs to deliver the service.

Why was change needed?

Prior to 2011, contraceptive and sexual health service providers in London developed their own PGDs. It became apparent from discussions with lead nurses and doctors within the services that there were problems due to the many different versions being used and the human resource needed to develop/review PGDs on a regular basis. There was a risk of inconsistent standards of care and risks associated with practice where nurses employed in more than one organisation had to work to different PGDs. At that time, it was calculated that there were at least 30 versions of each PGD. …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Highlights from this issue
    British Medical Journal Publishing Group