Article Text

PDF
Comment on ‘Inserting the etonogestrel contraceptive implant’
  1. Stephen Searle, FFSRH, MFPHM
  1. Paul O'Brien, MSc, MFSRH
  1. Sam Rowlands, LLM, MD
  1. Consultant, Sexual Health Services, Chesterfield, UK; essearle@doctors.org.uk
  2. Associate Specialist, Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Raymede Clinic, St Charles Hospital, London, UK; paul.obrien@afe2.org.uk
  3. Visiting Professor, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK; srowlands@bournemouth.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

We were most interested to read the letter1 from Martyn Walling about the insertion technique for the etonogestrel implant. We too have adopted his technique of injecting local anaesthetic only at the site of needle puncture and not along the length of the proposed track. We also agree with Walling that after the needle has penetrated the dermis it should be withdrawn until the bevel is seen and then insertion continued after the angle of the needle has been adjusted to parallel to the skin surface. Some argue against the former on the grounds that the insertion will be more painful, but most of the pain experienced is when the skin is penetrated. We have however noticed that the last 1 cm of insertion is, for some unknown reason, often painful at the tip.

We feel Walling did not make himself entirely clear about the reasons for the above techniques. …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.